🔗 Share this article

Transpired Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.