🔗 Share this article

Throughout the initial chapters of Authentic: The Myth of Bringing Your Full Self to Work, writer Jodi-Ann Burey raises a critical point: everyday advice to “be yourself” or “bring your full, authentic self to work” are far from well-meaning invitations for personal expression – they’re traps. This initial publication – a mix of personal stories, research, cultural commentary and conversations – seeks to unmask how businesses take over individual identity, moving the responsibility of corporate reform on to employees who are frequently at risk.

Professional Experience and Larger Setting

The motivation for the book originates in part in the author’s professional path: multiple jobs across retail corporations, new companies and in global development, interpreted via her experience as a Black disabled woman. The conflicting stance that Burey experiences – a back-and-forth between expressing one’s identity and seeking protection – is the core of the book.

It lands at a period of general weariness with institutional platitudes across America and other regions, as opposition to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs increase, and various institutions are scaling back the very systems that once promised change and reform. Burey enters that terrain to contend that retreating from the language of authenticity – that is, the business jargon that reduces individuality as a set of aesthetics, quirks and pastimes, leaving workers preoccupied with handling how they are viewed rather than how they are treated – is not the answer; instead, we need to reframe it on our personal terms.

Minority Staff and the Display of Identity

By means of detailed stories and interviews, the author demonstrates how employees from minority groups – individuals of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, female employees, people with disabilities – quickly realize to calibrate which identity will “fit in”. A weakness becomes a liability and people try too hard by working to appear agreeable. The practice of “presenting your true self” becomes a display surface on which numerous kinds of expectations are projected: emotional labor, revealing details and continuous act of gratitude. In Burey’s words, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but lacking the safeguards or the trust to endure what emerges.

‘In Burey’s words, employees are requested to expose ourselves – but lacking the protections or the confidence to endure what emerges.’

Real-Life Example: Jason’s Experience

The author shows this phenomenon through the story of an employee, a deaf employee who took it upon himself to educate his co-workers about deaf culture and communication norms. His readiness to talk about his life – an act of transparency the office often praises as “sincerity” – for a short time made everyday communications easier. Yet, the author reveals, that advancement was fragile. After staff turnover eliminated the informal knowledge the employee had developed, the atmosphere of inclusion dissolved with it. “Everything he taught went away with the staff,” he comments exhaustedly. What was left was the weariness of having to start over, of being held accountable for an organization’s educational process. According to Burey, this is what it means to be asked to expose oneself without protection: to risk vulnerability in a structure that applauds your openness but refuses to codify it into regulation. Genuineness becomes a pitfall when companies count on personal sharing rather than organizational responsibility.

Writing Style and Concept of Dissent

Her literary style is simultaneously lucid and lyrical. She combines scholarly depth with a style of solidarity: an invitation for readers to lean in, to interrogate, to oppose. In Burey’s opinion, dissent at work is not loud rebellion but principled refusal – the practice of opposing uniformity in settings that expect appreciation for basic acceptance. To dissent, from her perspective, is to challenge the accounts institutions narrate about equity and inclusion, and to decline involvement in customs that perpetuate unfairness. It might look like naming bias in a discussion, opting out of uncompensated “diversity” labor, or defining borders around how much of oneself is made available to the organization. Dissent, Burey indicates, is an declaration of personal dignity in settings that often encourage obedience. It represents a practice of honesty rather than opposition, a way of asserting that a person’s dignity is not dependent on institutional approval.

Reclaiming Authenticity

Burey also rejects rigid dichotomies. Her work does not merely discard “authenticity” entirely: instead, she calls for its redefinition. According to the author, sincerity is not simply the unfiltered performance of character that organizational atmosphere frequently praises, but a more deliberate harmony between one’s values and personal behaviors – a principle that opposes distortion by institutional demands. Rather than considering authenticity as a requirement to reveal too much or conform to cleansed standards of openness, Burey advises readers to maintain the elements of it rooted in honesty, individual consciousness and ethical clarity. In her view, the aim is not to abandon authenticity but to relocate it – to transfer it from the corporate display practices and into interactions and workplaces where reliance, equity and answerability make {